Can this actually replace my ad revenue?
For content sites with engaged readers (avg. session >2 minutes), yes. A site with 100k monthly visitors and 50% opt-in rate earns roughly $0.04 per GPU-hour contributed. That works out to comparable or better revenue than programmatic display ads for most niche publishers — and you keep 100% of it instead of 30–50% after the ad network's cut. The math gets better as GPU utilization rates improve and compute demand grows.
Is this just a cryptominer with extra steps?
No — and we built the network specifically to be the opposite. Cryptominers run inside ads, without consent, and benefit the site operator at the visitor's expense. Warppool requires explicit per-session opt-in, surfaces what's running, throttles to background-tab limits, and pays the credit to whoever the visitor authorized. The first thing on every roadmap is making fraud easy to spot.
What does it cost to run a job?
Researchers with verifiable institutional affiliation (university, public lab, school) run free — no cap, just don't be silly with it. Everyone else is billed per millisecond of completed compute: you pay only for tasks that returned a verified result. Failed tasks, timeouts, canary tasks, and redundant re-runs cost nothing. Indicative rate is around $0.04 per GPU-hour. Embed the worker tag on your own site and you earn credits back at the same rate.
How fast is one browser GPU, really?
A mid-range integrated GPU (M-series, recent Intel) returns ~1.5 GFLOPS-equivalent on the Monte Carlo benchmark you see in the hero. A discrete RTX-class card returns 30–80×. Calibration runs on join, so the Warppool scheduler always knows roughly how big a task a given worker can swallow in ~2 seconds.